Contents
1.
Mission
1.1.
Mission Statement
1.2.
PICUM’s policy
2.
Organization
2.1.
Secretariat and coordinator
2.2.
PICUM Assembly
2.3.
Executive Committee (Excom)
3. Activities
3.1.
Organizational Work
3.1.1.
Vacancy of Coordinator
3.1.2.
Establishing the PICUM secretariat and
3.1.3.
Informing member organisations and
3.1.4.
Developing individual contacts with organisations
3.1.5.
Developing contacts through the PICUM
3.1.6.
Extending the network to other relevant NGOs
3.1.7.
Developing contacts with EU and national
3.1.8.
Establishing an international committee of
3.2.
Thematic Work
3.2.1.
Organisation
of an International Expert Seminar
3.2.2.
European policy developments with regard to undocumented migrants
3.2.3.
Research into basic social rights and regularisation
3.2.4.
PICUM
Information and Documentation Centre
4. Evaluation
5. Prospects
This
is the first Annual Report presented by the Platform for International
Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM) located in Brussels. It covers two
periods of activities in 2000: a first period of more than ten months without a
coordinator and without an office, then the period beginning 15 November when
Ms. Nele Verbruggen could begin her work at an office made available by the
Steunpunt Mensen zonder Papieren in Brussels.
In
1995 and 1996, conferences were held in German and Dutch academies dealing with
the Europeanisation of asylum policies. In the aftermath of these conferences a
small follow-up group discussed the need for a third conference, but after some
time it concluded that there was even more need for a European
initiative for the protection of the rights of undocumented or irregular
migrants. Many of these migrants may be asylum seekers whose request for asylum
has been rejected and who have stayed on in the host country, but probably in
even more cases an undocumented migrant may be a migrant worker without a valid
residence permit, or a person who simply has overstayed the period of validity
of this authorisation to stay.
In
1998 therefore the follow-up group decided to start the PICUM initiative and to
draft, with the help of a questionnaire, a report comparing
the social situation of undocumented migrants in Germany, Belgium and The
Netherlands. On the basis of this report the initiators wrote a draft project
proposal in view of obtaining funds for a study into the question how the human
rights of undocumented migrants should be implemented. In 2000, several
foundations made funds available for an initial period. Thus PICUM could ‘come
to life’ and develop its project further.
Government
policies in most European countries aim at excluding undocumented migrants from
many facilities thus provoking their social exclusion. Their marginalisation in
society is now understood as becoming a major social problem, apart from the
human tragedies involved. PICUM intends to draw attention to this situation,
encourage and enable NGO’s supporting ‘sans papiers’ to effectively do
their work and to establish a centre of expertise on this issue.
For
the time being the PICUM membership is located in the three countries involved
in the original follow-up group, viz. Germany, Belgium and The Netherlands, with
an extension towards the U.K. Several
European NGO’s dealing with asylum and migration issues are involved in PICUM
as well. In the near future PICUM will extend its network of members to other
parts of Europe.
We
hope that this Annual Report will inspire its readers to actively supporting
PICUM in its efforts.
March
2001.
On
behalf of the PICUM Executive Committee
Pieter Muller, Chairman
The
Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants aims at
promoting respect for fundamental human and social rights in all issues related
to undocumented migrants within Europe.
PICUM
considers the following international treaties and conventions as basic values:
Universal
Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR), European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR),
Convention on the rights of the child (CRC), International Convention on the
Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families
(UNCRMW, Convention n°158, not yet operational), International Covenant on
Economical, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESR), International treaty on Civil
and Political Rights (ICCPR), European Social Charter, UN Convention on the
Protection of Refugees, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), Convention Against Torture and other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT)
The
social rights of citizens as expressed in the constitutions of the national
states involved will be taken into account as well.
Aim
The
aim of PICUM is threefold:
1)
To promote respect for the basic Social Rights (such as the right to education
and training, the right to healthcare, the right to a minimum income, the right
to family life, the right to moral and psychological integrity, and the right to
legal aid) of undocumented migrants
2)
To promote respect for human rights in the detention and expulsion of
undocumented migrants
3)
To investigate the possibilities of, and to promote regularisation of the
residence of undocumented migrants
(Note:
in agreement with decisions made at the PICUM Assembly meeting at Oirschot, NL,
October 2000, detention, expulsion and return migration policies are not given
top priority in the initial period. Regularisation policies are monitored only)
Objectives
PICUM
seeks to achieve this aim by:
1.
Gathering information on law and practice regarding Social Rights,
detention and expulsion of irregular immigrants, and the possibilities of
regularisation of their residence. The project is focusing on three EU countries
in particular, viz. Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands
2.
Developing a centre of expertise in these fields with a view to providing
the members of PICUM and other interested parties with expertise, advice and
support.
3.
Strengthening
networking between organisations dealing with undocumented migrants in Europe.
4.
Formulating
recommendations for improving the legal and social position of these immigrants,
in accordance with the national constitutions and international treaties. These
recommendations are to be presented to the relevant authorities, to other
organisations and to the public at large.
1.2.
PICUM’s Policy
It
is generally agreed that the presence of ‘sans papiers’ (undocumented,
irregular or clandestine migrants) in our countries is a major social problem,
both for the people concerned and for society as a whole. Leaving them without
any support means their social exclusion. It often leads to inhumane and morally
unacceptable situations tending towards their marginalization and their becoming
a risk factor in society.
We
have to acknowledge the fact that the number of ‘sans papiers’ – which
already is considerable – is increasing day by day in spite of all sorts of
restrictive government control measures. In Belgium approximately 50.000 people
made an application for the most recent regularisation procedure (January 2000).
Estimates indicate that this is only one third of the total number of
undocumented migrants in Belgium. In
the Netherlands it is estimated that there are over 100.000 people resident
illegally, while in Germany, there are thought to be approximately 1.000.000 or
more. The legal possibilities for NGOs to give support to these people by
providing them with food and shelter are being reduced rapidly.
An
enquiry made by PICUM member organizations in Germany, the Netherlands and
Belgium found that ‘sans papiers’ in these countries are often denied the
rights they are entitled to under international treaties and conventions, and
that protection is lacking. For this reason the structural approach favored by
PICUM is focusing on:
-
basic
social rights of ‘sans papiers’ as a protection against their
marginalization;
-
human
rights of ‘sans papiers’ as a protection against unlawful detention and
deportation;
-
possibilities
for regularization of ‘sans papiers’.
PICUM
also wants to take the situation in the countries of origin into consideration,
based on a concern for a durable immigration policy that can also generate
development. Regarding return programs,
PICUM is concerned about their effectiveness for the personal life project for
the person considered (and his family) and the effects on the development
chances for the country of origin. PICUM recommends and supports an
investigation into the option of investing in organizations run by migrants and
refugees that have as a specific aim the establishment of development projects
for their countries of origin.
2.1.
Secretariat and coordinator
In
November, 2000, PICUM set up a secretariat on a temporary basis with a full-time
coordinator, funded by a number of Dutch and Belgian Foundations.
Secretariat:
Gaucheretstraat
164 / 1030 Brussels – Belgium/ Tel: +32 (2) 274.14.39 / Fax: +32 (2) 274.14.48
/ e-mail: info@picum.org
(Coordinator: Ms. Nele Verbruggen)
2.2.
PICUM Assembly
A
Double Structure
At
the Excom meeting in Brussels (30/ 11/ 2000), the Excom members agreed to
propose to the next General Assembly that PICUM would be given a ‘double
structure’. On the one hand,
PICUM will be a legally constituted organisation according to Belgian law
(asbl/vzw), consisting of individual members proposed by NGOs. On the other
hand, PICUM will be a Platform of NGOs who agree to cooperate in the framework
of this Platform with a view to defending the human rights of undocumented
migrants.
This
organisation will be established by the ‘founding members’ of PICUM.(see
below)
Members
At
the end of the year 2000, the following NGOs were participating in the PICUM
platform:
-
Germany: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft
Asyl in der Kirche, Cologne
Flüchtlingsrat
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Dülmen
Pax
Christi Deutschland, Bonn
Evangelische
Akademie Mülheim an der Ruhr
- The Netherlands:
ASKV-SV (Steunpunt Vluchtelingen), Amsterdam
Council
of Churches in the Netherlands, Amersfoort
Netwerk
Religieuzen voor Vluchtelingen,
Eindhoven
Stichting
VON (Vluchtelingenorganisaties Nederland)
- Belgium:
Steunpunt Mensen zonder Papieren, Brussels
Protestants Sociaal Centrum, Antwerp
- Great
Britain:
Human
Too, London
- International
NGOs: Quaker Council for
European Affairs, Brussels
Jesuit Refugee Service – Europe, Brussels
Pax Christi International, Brussels
Justice et Paix International, Brussels
Churches’
Commission for Migrants in Europe (CCME), Brussels
Platform
of European Red Cross Organisations (PERCO), Brussels
Espaces
(Dominican Brethren), Rixensart (B)
Migrants
Rights International, Geneva
Meetings
The
individual members of PICUM meet twice a year at an Assembly. In 2000 the first
meeting took place in Düsseldorf (Germany), 7 and 8 May. The second Assembly
took place in Oirschot (the Netherlands), on 13 and 14 October 2000.
2.3.
Executive Committee (Excom)
In the Articles of Association it will be stipulated that the Excom will be responsible for the day to day work of the PICUM secretariat and administration, including organisational and financial matters. Between the Assemblies the Executive Committee functions as the governing body.
In
2000, the Excom consisted of the founding members of PICUM:
Pieter
Muller, Raad Van Kerken Nederland (The Netherlands): Chairman
Didier
Vanderslycke, Steunpunt Mensen Zonder Papieren (Belgium)
Dominique
van Huystee, ASKV-Steunpunt Vluchtelingen Amsterdam (The Netherlands)
Hildegard
Grosse, Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft (BAG) Asyl in der Kirche (Germany)
As soon as the organisation is established the four founding members appoint the first Excom members, who may or may not be founding members themselves.
The
coordinator is working on a contractual basis with ‘Steunpunt Mensen Zonder
Papieren vzw’ (SMZP), a Belgian NGO that is also a member of PICUM.
An agreement has been drafted (and signed at the beginning of 2001) on
the relationship between the coordinator, PICUM, and the legal employer, SMZP.
It is agreed that the work of the coordinator is directed by the Excom, which
delegates its power to Didier Vanderslycke, Excom member and president of SMZP.
At the Assembly in Oirschot (13/14 October 2000), an Action Plan was adopted for the first operational period: from 15 November 2000 until 15 May 2001. Based on this Action Plan, the following are the planned activities of PICUM during the year 2000 (including the period before the Action Plan was adopted).
As
a result of the positive outcome of our fundraising activities (see below) we
were able to invite applicants for the vacancy of coordinator on the basis of
the profile adopted at earlier PICUM meetings. We received 14 written
applications. Three applicants had a personal interview at the premises of
Steunpunt Mensen zonder Papieren (SMZP). Ms. N. Verbruggen, a Belgian
national, was unanimously considered to be the best candidate. She was offered a
6-month position beginning in November 2000.
3.1.2.
Establishing the PICUM secretariat and administration in Brussels
The
PICUM secretariat became operational on 15th November, 2000. An
office was set up, phone and internet connections established, and a domain name
registered.
A
legal structure according to Belgian law (asbl/vzw) was drafted in order to be
put before the General Assembly in February 2001. As stated above, the
relationship between the coordinator, the official employer (SMZP), and PICUM
was established by way of a formal agreement.
Another
part of the organisational work to be mentioned under this heading is the
necessary follow up by the coordinator of the Assembly Meeting in Oirschot, the
preparation and reporting of the Excom meeting in November, and the setting up
of the preparation of the General Assembly in February 2001.
3.1.3.Informing
member organisations and other contacts about PICUM and its secretariat
In
order to inform member organisations and other contacts about PICUM and its
secretariat, a Mission Statement, a Policy Paper, and an Action Plan have been
drafted. All member organisations of PICUM, including those participating in the
‘Information Exchange Network’ (see 3.1.5.) only, as well as other contacts,
have been sent a PICUM folder accompanied by PICUM New Year’s wishes.
3.1.4.Developing
(individual) contacts with organisations participating in PICUM
In
the course of the first months the coordinator visited most of the PICUM
members. The aim was to get to know the participants of the Platform, to get an
idea of what they could contribute to PICUM and, especially, of what they
expected of the Platform.
3.1.5.Developing
contacts through the PICUM Information Exchange Network (mailinglist)
In
the course of the year several NGOs interested in or involved with undocumented
migrants joined the PICUM ‘Information Exchange Network’. In the period
before the Secretariat was operational, one of the PICUM members, Wolfgang Müller
(Flüchtlingsrat Nordrhein-Westfalen) volunteered to function as a postmaster.
His task was to spread useful and interesting information on undocumented
migration to the persons and organizations that are part of the Network. All
those organisation can also apply themselves to have certain information spread
by the Exchange Network.
At
the end of the year the number of participants amounted to 70, and the
Secretariat took over the Postmaster activity.
3.1.6.Extending
the network to other relevant NGOs
In
February the chairman was present at a meeting at Quaker House in Brussels to
which a number of European NGOs involved with undocumented migrants had been
invited. He gave a briefing about the aims and methods of PICUM. All the NGOs at
the meeting decided to join PICUM either as members or as participants in the
Information Exchange Network.
3.1.7.Developing
contacts with EU and national politicians, with government bodies
In
the course of the year a number of contacts were made with national politicians
in Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany. Pending
the establishment of the PICUM secretariat these contacts were kept at low
profile. Particularly valuable was a meeting on the issue of undocumented
migrants with several German MPs held in Berlin in November. On this occasion
political attention was drawn to the section on ‘Health Care’ of the
provisional “PICUM document on basic rights of undocumented migrants in
Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany” – a comparative report presenting the
social situation of the undocumented in these countries.
3.1.8.Establishing
an international committee of recommendation
Already
in early 2000 it was felt that the PICUM project should be supported by a
committee of recommendation. In view of this initial contacts were established
with a number of senior Dutch politicians and scientists. as well as with Ms.
Mary Robinson, UN Commissioner for Human Rights.
3.1.9.Fundraising
Fundraising
efforts were primarily developed in the Netherlands. In this country four
foundations were interested in supporting the PICUM initiative for an initial
period of six months, viz. the Haëlla Foundation, PIN (a fundgiving committee
acting on behalf of several Roman Catholic congregations), Cordaid and a fourth
foundation. Thanks to their joint efforts it was possible to open the PICUM
secretariat in Brussels, hire a coordinator and launch a number of activities.
At
a meeting with representatives of these four foundations in The Hague in October
2000, we presented our plans for the initial period and were pleased to note the
comments and suggestions made by the fundgivers.
PICUM
was also granted a subsidy in Belgium, through Steunpunt Mensen zonder Papieren.
In the UK the Boyd & Morland Charitable Trust made a small grant available,
which arrived in 2001.
Initial
contacts were made with several civil servants of the European Commission with a
view to exploring possibilities of receiving aid from EU structural funds. These
contacts require a follow-up in 2001.
We
are very grateful for the support we have received, and look forward to a
further meeting with our Dutch funders in March 2001.
3.2.1.Organisation
of an International Expert Seminar on Health Care for Undocumented Migrants
The
first aim of the Platform, as mentioned above, is promoting the respect for the
basic Social Rights of undocumented migrants. One of these rights is the Right
to Health Care. The situation, both in law and in practice, relating to this
right differs considerably in the different European countries. In some,
undocumented migrants have (legally) no access at all to Medical Care, in
others, the policy is less restrictive and health provisions tend to be more
accessible for this group of migrants.
A
comparison of the situation in different countries provides valuable information
and opportunities. Arguments and opinions can be exchanged to influence national
policy, views and recommendations can be assembled for communication to the
relevant European policy makers. To
encourage this information exchange, PICUM has organised an International Expert
Seminar on ‘Access to Health Care for Undocumented Migrants’. This
takes place in March 2001.
This
project will bring together experts in health care for undocumented migrants
from the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and Great Britain for a
day and a half, to discuss
both law and practice
concerning access to doctors and hospitals, access to specialists like dentists,
access to mental health care, and health insurance. What is laid down in the
law, what are the problems, what are possible solutions, what can be learnt form
each other’s countries? We will also address the theme of (temporary)
residence permits for medical reasons. During the last part of the Seminar,
which will be attended by several members of the European Parliament,
the conclusions and recommendations of the seminar will be formulated.
The
publication following the seminar will contain theoretical information about the
situation in the participating countries, together with written reports of the
seminar discussions, and the final conclusions and recommendations. This
publication will be given to all the participants and can be bought from PICUM
by non-participants. We consider such a publication useful for further
disseminating the results of the seminar: to communicate our points of view and
concerns to relevant policy makers, to contribute to the work of scientists
involved, and to provide information to NGOs working with undocumented migrants.
In this way the Seminar will contribute substantially to existing knowledge on
the theme, which so far is limited.
The
first concrete preparations for the seminar were started in early 2000. Experts
in Health Care among the PICUM contacts were consulted.
With the help of PICUM members and contacts in the four participating
countries, Health Care Experts were searched out and invited to participate in
the Seminar.
3.2.2.
European
policy developments with regard to undocumented migrants
In
the area of EU policy, the PICUM Action Plan of October 2000 defined four
headings: the ‘EU Charter for Fundamental Rights’, the ‘Amsterdam
Proposals’, the ‘UN Convention 158’ and ‘Further EU Policy
Developments’.
EU
Charter for Fundamental Rights
One of our members (Quaker Council for European Affairs) monitored the debates on the considering the European Charter. We’ve been reported on this theme at the general Assembly and through e-mail.
The
Amsterdam Proposals
The
Amsterdam Proposals were published in March 2000 by the Immigration Law
Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) and the Migration Policy Group (MPG). The
Proposals reflect the views and concerns of non-governmental organisations, law
practitioners and academics active in the field of immigration and asylum. They
are intended to assist EU policy makers in formulating legislation.
The
Amsterdam Proposals put forward directives on Asylum, on the right to Family
Reunion, on Long-term Residents, on Visas and Border Controls, on the Admission
of Migrants, and on Irregular Migrants. Of PICUM’s particular concern is the
Proposed Directive on Irregular Migrants.
PICUM
recognized the importance of this initiative, and decided to monitor its
evolvements. We decided to conduct a Workshop on this Amsterdam Proposal at the
next Assembly meeting in Antwerp, to which we invited Mr. Jan Niessen (MPG,
Brussels) as the main author of the Proposed Directives.
UN
Convention Nr. 158
‘Convention
158’ is the shorter name for the ‘United Nations International Convention on
the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their
Families’. This Convention was adopted on the 18th of December 1990
by the UN General Assembly.
Although the formal adoption of this Convention took place ten years ago, the Convention is not yet in force. Few countries have taken the necessary steps to adopt its standards by signing and ratifying or acceding to this Convention, thus incorporating its standards into national law. To ‘enter into force’ - in other words; to become operative and part of international law, ratification or accession by 20 states is required for this instrument. It may then be used as an authoritative standard of good practice, and thus may exercise strong persuasive power on non-party States as well, even though they have not agreed to be bound by its standards. So far the Convention has 15 accessions: Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cape Verde, Colombia, Egypt, Ghana, Guinea, Mexico, Morocco, Philippines, Senegal, Seychelles, Sri Lanka and Uganda. Furthermore, 10 States are signatories, so it is highly probable that the Convention will enter into force in the year 2001.
While
the Convention specifically addresses migrant workers, ratification and
implementation of its provisions would provide a significant measure of
protection for most other migrants in vulnerable situations. This, together with
the fact that all the countries that acceded so far –apart from Bosnia
Herzegovina – are not European, made the PICUM Assembly decide to undertake
some action within the framework of the ratification campaign for this
Convention. We decided for this
reason to invite Patrick Taran, director of Migrant Rights International
(Geneva) to our next Assembly meeting in Antwerp.
Further
EU policy developments
The
main subject of PICUM attention under this heading is the proposal by the French
Presidency (july-december 2000) that would criminalise many, if not all PICUM’
NGO members. Through the PICUM Information Exchange System we disseminated
information on these proposals, aiming at penalising those providing help to
‘sans papiers’ in the EU and imposing heavy fines on organisations in this
field. These proposals do not differentiate between help given for payment and
help given free on purely humanitarian grounds. Such unremunerated help is a
major part of the work of all the NGOs concerned with undocumented migrants.
At
their meeting in Brussels in December the EU Ministers of Justice and of the
Interior decided to postpone a decision on these proposals pending the
formulation of a humanitarian clause excluding help given free on humanitarian
grounds. Political lobbying in this matter is a major priority for PICUM.
PICUM
was accepted as a member of the NGO Platform of the UNHCR, where developments
considering migration and asylum on the European level are discussed. The
coordinator attended one meeting before the end of the year 2000.
3.2.3.
Research into basic social rights and regularisation of irregular migrants
Fact
finding
An important part of PICUM’s activities is fact-finding about research in the fields of basic social rights and regularization of irregular migrants. The secretariat started to set up an inventory of the researchers, research institutions, completed research and existing literature on basic social rights and regularization of irregular migrants.
Book
of Solidarity
Within
six months, it was felt PICUM should produce some outcome, a tangible product.
The Assembly meeting (Oirschot October 2000) agreed on the idea of a
‘Book of Solidarity’. This publication would demonstrate support for
undocumented migrants, and illustrate the contrast between principle and
practice in the treatment of irregular migrants and the role of the
organisations that help them. In this way we can transmit an important message,
providing examples of solidarity, for instance, in Germany, where helping
‘illegals’ is forbidden. We would like to show that PICUM’s cause is shared, - that
‘we have troops behind us’. Preparations for the publication started at the
beginning of 2001.
Easy
Scapegoats
In
October, Hildegard Grosse (Excom) and Pieter Muller (Chairman) attended a
conference in Mannheim during which discussions took place on the results of a
research project: ‘Easy Scapegoats – Sans Papiers Immigrants in Europe –
State Strategies and Intervention Strategies for Civil Society’. The research
examined the position of irregular immigrants in Germany. Belgium, Italy and
Spain. This project was supported by the Freudenberg Stiftung at Weinheim,
Germany, jointly with several foundations in Belgium, Italy and Spain, as well
as the European Commission. At the conference researchers, representatives of
foundations and NGOs concerned with irregular migrants’ issues considered the
research findings and drafted recommendations.
In
a discussion with the director of the Freudenberg Stiftung, the feasibility of
cooperation between PICUM and this foundation was discussed with a view to
providing an effective follow-up to the ‘Easy Scapegoats’ project.
It was agreed that this idea would require further discussion.
Conferences
In
April, the Chairman made a presentation on the issue of undocumented migrants in
Europe at a conference of the Academy of the Rothenburg Diocese in Stuttgart
which covered the question of persons without valid residence permits.
A
similar presentation was made at a conference of the ‘Asyl in der Kirche’
Association at the Protestant Academy at Mülheim/Ruhr on ‘Rights for those
without rights – Protection for illegal refugees’, in May.
In
June, the Chairman, Dominique van Huystee and Rian Ederveen attended a day
seminar at the University of Brussels, held by the academic network of legal
studies on the immigration and asylum policies in Europe. The Seminar, which
considered the issue of regularisation of illegal foreigners in Europe, was the
first in a series of research topics within the context of the EU ‘Odysseus’
Programme.
In
September, the Chairman attended a conference of Pro Asyl at the Protestant
Academy at Arnoldshain on asylum policies in the European Union, partly in order
to present Dutch asylum policies, partly in order to develop PICUM contacts with
relevant German NGOs.
In
December the coordinator attended a ‘Congress for specialist lawyers in the
area of immigration and asylum in Europe’ in Brussels organized by the
Academic network of Legal Studies on Immigration and Asylum in Europe.
During
the year the Chairman and Dominique van Huystee (Excom) attended several
meetings of the Dutch Platform of NGOs on Undocumented Migrants, drawing
attention to developments with PICUM.
3.2.4.PICUM
Information and Documentation Centre on Human Rights for Undocumented Migrants
During
the first months of its existence, the secretariat received requests for
information which it was able to answer with the help of the network. It is one
of the aims for 2001 to develop further the PICUM Information and Documentation
centre on the basis of the PICUM Information Exchange System.
Set against our
targets for the year 2000, our progress is as follows.
-
Successful fundraising results have been
obtained in the Netherlands; results in Belgium were less, but helpful; results
in the UK were little, but unexpected.
-
During the first ten months of the year,
building on contacts established in two previous years, we were able to prepare
the background i.e. by organising assembly meetings, exchanging information
through the PICUM Mailing List, making numerous contacts and presentations at
conferences in a number of countries. Thus a network of NGOs in Belgium, Germany
and The Netherlands – with a first step into the U.K. – has been developed.
These NGOs are becoming familiar with each other’s general approach and
specific working methods towards the fundamental issues PICUM stands for, and
are willing to contribute to the common objective. In addition, an
organisational structure for PICUM has emerged, in which those member
organisations and persons most willing to push PICUM forward in their three
countries have committed themselves as members of an Executive Committee
(Excom).
-
In the course of the year it became clear that
we had to rethink our first aim of ourselves undertaking research into the basic
social rights of undocumented migrants. We concluded that our aim should instead
be: to assemble information on existing and ongoing research in this field and
make this available for member NGOs and other interested parties, in order to
back up their practical work. At the same time, the political lobbying at
European level has emerged as a priority. The other priority areas –
regularisation, detention and expulsion – had to be given less attention than
was first intended. The return option (return migration) also came up as an
issue to claim attention, but we felt that we, with our limited means, could not
for the foreseeable future develop this further.
- Finally, it was felt that PICUM should prove its value by producing ‘concrete products’. Accordingly, the international seminar on Access to Health Care, the ‘Book of Solidarity’, as well as the two workshops in February 2001, make a positive start in fulfilling this goal.
PICUM has the potential to develop into a European NGO that can make a major contribution to the defence of the basic social rights of undocumented migrants. This potential lies in the fact that we have
- a nucleus of member NGOs in a number of European countries who have a clear vision of the grave situation of ‘sans papiers’ in their countries and the ways this situation should be tackled; are able and willing to share their experience in this field and strongly support the cause PICUM stands for
- a small secretariat in Brussels with a full time coordinator
- moral and practical (financial) support for the PICUM initiative from many sides
- increasing understanding of the fact that present asylum and migration policies in Europe lead to social exclusion and marginalisation of increasing numbers of people endangering social cohesion in European societies.
In order to be able to act as a European NGO PICUM has to develop its NGO network in countries in Southern and Northern Europe, servicing the relevant NGOs in these countries in view of their work and involving them in expert seminars etc. in order to influence state and local policies.
The focus of PICUM activities should be to support its member NGOs in their work both by providing them with practical information and models of action, and by helping them to create a political and economical environment which enables them to actively carry out their humanitarian work on behalf of undocumented migrants.
We foster the hope that we shall be able to muster the means to develop our work to the full in the difficult years to come.